Final answer:
The two human factors that inhibit sharing in hyper-social organizations are fear of judgment and criticism and lack of trust, both of which contribute to an environment where groupthink becomes prevalent and stifles innovation.
Step-by-step explanation:
The two human factors that inhibit sharing in hyper-social organizations are fear of judgment and criticism and lack of trust. Fear of judgment can cause individuals to self-censor, avoiding sharing ideas that may be perceived as divergent or controversial. Lack of trust, on the other hand, impedes open communication because individuals may not believe that their contributions will be valued or fairly acknowledged, often linked to a competitive mindset within the group. Both factors contribute to an environment where groupthink becomes prevalent, potentially leading to poor decision-making and the stifling of innovation.
These factors are accentuated in large groups where anonymity may lead to social loafing, where individuals put in less effort due to the inability to identify individual contributions. Additionally, tribalism can cause alignment with like-minded individuals which further hinders diversity of thought and cross-sharing among group members. Lastly, the symptoms of groupthink, such as the illusion of invulnerability and moral correctness, self-censorship, and pressured conformity, tend to manifest more strongly in a hyper-social organization inhibited by fear and lack of trust.