Final answer:
In the ethical element of the whistle-blowing process, being fair is known as sensitivity. It involves evaluating the impact of the disclosure, avoiding biases, and reflecting on the accuracy of the information. It's also related to standing up for one's beliefs in the face of group pressure, as shown in Asch's study on conformity.
Step-by-step explanation:
Before blowing the whistle, followers should indeed consider if they are being fair, which is the ethical element of the whistle-blowing process known as sensitivity. Sensitivity in this context refers to the awareness of the ethical implications of one's actions and the consideration of fairness towards those who might be affected by those actions. It includes understanding the potential impact on colleagues, the organization, and the wider public, as well as reflecting on one's own motivations and biases.
Whistle-blowers should carefully evaluate the accuracy and relevance of their information, consider expert consensus, and avoid biases before making their claims. This consideration can prevent undue harm caused by unfounded accusations and ensure that the action taken is both morally justified and factually sound. It also relates to Asch's study on conformity, illustrating that having an ally or being able to resist group pressure can support individuals in making ethical decisions, including when to dissent and speak out.