Final answer:
The statement in question is false; species in temporary habitats generally have a higher rate of dispersal to find suitable conditions, as opposed to species in stable habitats that tend to be more sedentary.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that 'the rate of dispersal is greater in species occupying stable habitats than in those occupying temporary habitats' is false. Species in stable environments tend to have limited dispersal because the existing conditions support their survival and reproduction without the need for widespread movement. In contrast, species in temporary or changing environments often show greater dispersal rates as they are forced to move more frequently to find suitable habitats, resources, or escape from environmental pressures.
Examples of dispersal patterns include the random distribution of plants like dandelions due to their wind-dispersed seeds and the clumped distribution of animals like elephants that travel in groups. Directed dispersal to specific sites is particularly favorable for establishment and survival, which might happen more in temporary environments where finding a suitable habitat is critical.