Final answer:
The motivation for every nation's foreign policy is indeed its national interests, which is true. Neoconservatism is not isolationist but proactive in international affairs, making the related statement false. Early U.S. Indian policy was primarily motivated by land acquisition, which is true.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that the motivation behind every nation's foreign policy is its national interests is true. This encompasses a broad range of activities, including trade, finance, military concerns, human rights, environmental, and cultural issues. The methods by which a country interacts with other nations are strategically chosen to safeguard its national interests and achieve its goals.
Regarding neoconservatism, the claim that it is an isolationist foreign policy approach is false. Neoconservatism is known for advocating a proactive role in international affairs, which can include promoting democracy and using military power for international security. On the other hand, early U.S. Indian policy was heavily driven by the motive of land acquisition, making the statement true.
U.S. foreign policy includes goals such as maintaining national security, gaining access to foreign markets, and protecting human rights, as seen in the comprehensive choices labeled D. all the above.