Final answer:
The statement that magnification is more commonly used in veterinary practices than in veterinary teaching hospitals is false. Both settings use magnification tools, but the type and complexity of these tools, including light microscopes with a magnification of around 400x, can vary. Veterinary teaching hospitals often have access to more advanced tools like electron microscopes for educational and research purposes.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement 'Magnification is more commonly used in veterinary practices than veterinary teaching hospitals' is False. In veterinary practices and teaching hospitals, various types of microscopes are used for different purposes. A light microscope can magnify cells up to approximately 400 times, whereas a dissecting microscope, which has a lower magnification, typically between 20 and 80 times, is used to examine larger objects like tissues. Electron microscopes, which are used to resolve very small images, must be used in specialized facilities due to their complexity and cost, making them less common in routine veterinary practices. Veterinary teaching hospitals, given their educational and research purposes, may have more advanced microscopy equipment, which includes higher magnification tools like electron microscopes.
Magnification in microscopes produces images that can be real, inverted, and magnified, or virtual, upright, and magnified. In some microscope configurations, the image formed is larger than the object by a certain magnification factor, and due to the physics of lenses, this image might appear to exist on the same side of the lens as the object, characterizing it as virtual.
The use and preference of magnification tools can vary based on the specific needs of a practice or a hospital, but it is not accurate to state that magnification, in general, is more common in one setting over the other without specifying the type of magnification or the context in which it is used.