Final answer:
The assertion regarding community property laws is true as these laws consider both spouses as equal owners of income and assets acquired during marriage. The claim about proprietors in proprietary colonies having no responsibilities besides profit collection is false, as proprietors had multiple duties including governance and colony maintenance. Lastly, it is true that sharecroppers paid their rent in crop shares.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement, "Community property laws dictate that income earned by one spouse is treated as though it was earned equally by both spouses," is True. Community property laws refer to a legal framework in some jurisdictions where property and income acquired during the marriage are considered jointly owned by both spouses. This means that earnings, debts, and assets acquired are shared equally, and this affects how property is divided in the event of divorce and may also impact estate planning and taxes.
Regarding proprietary colonies, the statement "In a proprietary colony, the Proprietors have no responsibilities except to collect the profits" is False. Proprietors actually had numerous responsibilities including maintaining the colony, creating laws, and defending the colony, among others.
As for sharecroppers, the statement, "Sharecroppers were tenant farmers who paid their rent with shares of their crops," is True. This arrangement allowed sharecroppers, who often lacked the cash to pay rent, to work a portion of land in return for giving a part of their crop yield to the landowner as payment.