33.8k views
5 votes
1. Make a List of the firms key external opportunities and threats and internal strengths and weaknesses in the left column of the QSPM

2. Assigned weights to each key external and internal factor
3. Examine the stage two matching mattrices and identify alternative strategies that the organization should consider implementing
4. Determine the attractiveness scores (AS)
5. Compute the turtle attractiveness scores
6. Compared to some title attractiveness score

User Chalup
by
8.1k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

The student's question pertains to the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM), a tool for evaluating and choosing among strategic alternatives based on a structured analysis of a firm's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT analysis). This matrix helps in deciding the relative attractiveness of different strategies by assigning weighted scores and comparing them.

Step-by-step explanation:

Understanding the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM)

The process outlined in the student's question relates to the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix (QSPM), which is a high-level strategic management tool used to evaluate possible strategies by comparing them based on their relative attractiveness. The QSPM involves several steps:

  1. Making a list of the firm's key external opportunities and threats and internal strengths and weaknesses.
  2. Assigning weights to each key external and internal factor, which represent the importance of each in the context of the firm's overall strategy.
  3. Examining stage two matching matrices to identify alternative strategies that the organization should consider implementing.
  4. Determining the Attractiveness Scores (AS) which are numerical values indicating how attractive each strategy is based on the identified opportunities, threats, strengths, and weaknesses.
  5. Computing the Total Attractiveness Scores (TAS), which take into account the weights assigned to each factor and their respective AS.
  6. Comparing these scores to identify the most attractive strategy overall.

Understanding this process requires familiarity with strategic management concepts and the methodologies for assessing and comparing various strategic options based on structured criteria.

User Kiriloff
by
7.6k points