Final answer:
The conflict perspective depicts society as marked by continuous change and conflict, contrasting with the functionalist viewpoint of societal stability and cohesion. The main difference between these perspectives and the Symbolic Interactionist perspective is the focus on macro-level structures versus micro-level daily interactions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The functionalist perspective emphasizes society's stability through consensus and interconnectedness, while the conflict perspective portrays society as always changing and always marked by conflict.
The largest difference between the Functionalist and Conflict perspectives, and the Interactionist perspective, is that the former two consider long-term repercussions and function within a macro-level scope, studying society's structures and their necessary roles, whereas the Symbolic Interactionist perspective is a micro-level theory focusing on day-to-day interactions and the symbols within a culture.
When trying to understand social movements such as the Tea Party or the MeToo movement, a Functionalist might analyze the macro-level needs these movements serve, such as voicing political underrepresentation or drawing attention to gender inequality, respectively. On the other hand, the Conflict perspective would focus on the inherent societal inequalities and power struggles that underpin these movements.