Final answer:
Scientists accept a hypothesis based on a persuasive reading of the evidence, apparent and credible logic, inclusion of all relevant points, and sufficient evidence to justify the claim.
Step-by-step explanation:
The criterion that accumulated evidence must pass before committing to a choice in the Decision-Making Process (DDM) involves careful evaluation of hypotheses. Scientists typically accept a hypothesis if it provides a persuasive reading of the evidence, shows apparent and credible logic, and includes all relevant points. In addition, the evidence must be sufficient to justify the claim to knowledge. It is important that the evidence supporting the hypothesis is not only true, but also not due to accident or coincidence. An emphasis is placed on providing objective evidence that meets established criteria, which can vary depending on the context and expected results. An unexpected result may require stricter criteria. Furthermore, if a hypothesis is supported by a large body of experimental evidence, it may eventually be considered a theory.