Final answer:
The fallacy that candidates commit when they attack each other instead of discussing issues is called the fallacy of ad hominem.
Step-by-step explanation:
The fallacy that candidates commit when they attack each other instead of discussing issues is called the fallacy of ad hominem. This fallacy occurs when someone attacks the person making the argument rather than addressing the argument itself. By attacking their opponents personally, candidates divert attention away from the important issues at hand and focus on undermining their credibility or character.
For example, if a candidate criticizes their opponent's appearance or personal life instead of engaging in a substantive discussion about policy, they are committing the fallacy of ad hominem. This type of fallacy is misleading and unhelpful in informing voters about the candidates' actual positions and policies.
It is important for voters to recognize this fallacy and focus on evaluating candidates based on their ideas, qualifications, and plans for addressing the issues that matter most to them.