Final answer:
Yes, the division manager should be held responsible if the difference between the budget and actual results was controllable by them. Managers are expected to meet expectations and be accountable for their team's outcomes, including long-term impacts.
Step-by-step explanation:
If the Canadian Division of Sidmund, Inc.'s performance report showed differences that were controllable by the manager in charge, it implies that the deviation from the budget to the actual results was within the scope of the division manager's influence. Therefore, holding the division manager responsible would generally be considered appropriate, as accountability often falls on the manager for the outcomes of processes and decisions under their control. In the workplace, managers are expected to meet the expectations communicated to them, regardless of the method they employ to achieve these outcomes. As seen in the scenario where Noel saved the hospital money but potentially at the cost of long-term team dynamics, Tracy considered the broader implications of actions on the team's functioning, signifying that the manager's responsibility includes balancing immediate benefits with long-term impacts.