Question

Which of the following statements about note-taking is supported by research?

A. Color-coded notes improve retention.
B. Typing notes is always more effective than handwriting.
C. The Cornell method is the only efficient note-taking technique.
D. Reviewing notes within 24 hours has no impact on memory.

Answer 1

Color-coded notes can improve retention, handwriting notes is more effective than typing, Cornell method is not the only efficient technique, and reviewing notes within 24 hours impacts memory. The correct option is A.

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Statement A is supported by research. Color-coded notes can improve retention because they help organize information and make it easier to remember. For example, using different colors for different topics or key points can make the notes more visually memorable.
2. Statement B is not supported by research. Studies have shown that handwriting notes can be more effective than typing them. Handwriting engages more areas of the brain and promotes better comprehension and retention.
3. Statement C is not supported by research. While the Cornell method is a popular note-taking technique, it is not the only efficient one. Different students may find different methods more effective based on their learning style and preferences.
4. Statement D is not supported by research. Reviewing notes within 24 hours can have a significant impact on memory. It helps reinforce the information and allows for better retention. The correct option is A.