Final answer:
The IOC should be more concerned about the long-term success of host cities because it involves significant financial investments, reputation, and the responsibility to leave a positive legacy.
Step-by-step explanation:
The International Olympic Committee (IOC) should be more concerned about the long-term success of host cities for several reasons.
Firstly, hosting the Olympics is a massive undertaking that requires significant financial investments from the host city. These investments are often made with the expectation that the event will bring economic benefits to the city in the long run. However, if the event does not lead to sustained economic growth and development, the city may end up with a financial burden that it cannot afford.
Secondly, the reputation of the host city is at stake during the Olympics. If the event is poorly organized or if there are issues with infrastructure, security, or other aspects, it can leave a negative impression on the international stage. This can have long-lasting consequences for the city's tourism industry, international relationships, and overall image.
Lastly, the IOC has a responsibility to ensure that the Olympics leave a positive legacy for the host city and its residents. This includes not only the physical infrastructure built for the games but also the benefits and opportunities provided to the local community. If the IOC does not prioritize the long-term success of host cities, it may undermine the potential positive impact of the Olympics and fail to fulfill its mission of promoting sport, culture, and the well-being of athletes and the host communities.