Final answer:
The student's question pertains to the pitfalls of failing to build credibility and value in writing, which includes insufficient analysis, evidence, detail, and adherence to conventional writing expectations. These shortcomings can lead to a text that is not engaging, persuasive, or credible.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question appears to be addressing common shortcomings in writing, specifically in the context of building credibility and conveying value in a piece of text. Not adhering to task requirements such as paraphrasing, evaluating, or analyzing a reading selection; failing to provide sufficient evidence to support main ideas; lacking meaningful details, analysis, or explanations; and not meeting conventional expectations in rhetorically effective ways are all examples of falling short in delivering a comprehensive and credible piece of writing.
Analysis and evaluation are critical components of effective writing. Without these, a text may lack depth and fail to persuade or engage the reader. For instance, if writers do not adequately explain their points with concrete evidence or if they provide insufficient elaboration or clarification, their work may not be considered credible or valuable.
Consistency in point of view and character development are also important in maintaining a reader's interest and establishing trust in the narrative voice. Transitions and a clear conclusion are vital for maintaining flow and clarity in the text. Lastly, appropriate use of visual aids and citations can support a writer's argument and enhance the text's credibility.