Final answer:
The correct option regarding Casey's commuting situation is C) Casey may need to move to the other side of the city if he accepts the new assignment in the suburbs. This reflects the trends in urban development, suburban sprawl, and the evolution of commuter and lateral commuting patterns.
Step-by-step explanation:
Casey is considering a new job assignment in the suburbs on the other side of the city, which would increase the distance of his commute. The true statement regarding Casey's situation is C) Casey may need to move to the other side of the city if he accepts the new assignment in the suburbs.
Historically, as suburban sprawl increased, many people found that they could maintain or even reduce their commute times by moving closer to their workplace in the suburbs. This has led to the phenomena of commuter towns and lateral commuters. These trends are relevant when predicting Casey's potential need to move, as accepting the new assignment would make him a lateral commuter, driving from one suburb to another.
Furthermore, the growth of suburbs has had a notable impact on things like traffic congestion, accidents, and pollution. These issues are important to consider when deciding whether to move closer to work or not. It's possible that by moving, Casey might reduce personal negative impacts of commuting and enhance his overall quality of life.