Question

What evidence best supports the inference that Napoleon is falsely accusing Snowball of destroying the windmill? Check all that apply.

“The animals were shocked beyond measure to learn that even Snowball could be guilty of such an action.”
“There was a cry of indignation.”
“Almost immediately the footprints of a pig were discovered in the grass.”
“everyone began thinking out ways of catching Snowball if he should ever come back”
“Napoleon snuffed deeply at them and pronounced them to be Snowball's.”

Answer 1

The best evidence suggesting Napoleon's false accusations against Snowball include his baseless identification of footprints, the convenient timing of finding these footprints, and the animals' shocked reactions that are inconsistent with Snowball's character.

Step-by-step explanation:

The evidence that best supports the inference that Napoleon is falsely accusing Snowball of destroying the windmill can be observed by analyzing specific phrases from the book.

First, the statement "Napoleon snuffed deeply at them and pronounced them to be Snowball's" provides insight into the lack of concrete evidence and how Napoleon declares the footprints belong to Snowball based solely on his own assertion, not any incontrovertible proof.

Additionally, the fact that "Almost immediately the footprints of a pig were discovered in the grass" soon after the windmill's destruction suggests either a setup or an implausibly convenient discovery which benefits Napoleon and his agenda.

Lastly, the reactions of the animals, including statements like "The animals were shocked beyond measure to learn that even Snowball could be guilty of such an action" and "There was a cry of indignation," indicate that the accusations against Snowball conflict with his known character and the animals' expectations, casting further doubt on the validity of Napoleon's claims.