Final answer:
Europeans denied indigenous influence in directly ruled territories because they considered these territories as extensions of their home countries, with expectations for indigenous conformism driven by Europeans' economic, cultural, and religious motivations.
Step-by-step explanation:
Europeans who ruled territories directly often denied the influence of indigenous people because they saw territories as an extension of their home country and demanded that indigenous people conform. This was born from a sense of ethnocentric superiority and was reinforced by the economic and military power that Europeans wielded. Indigenous people's differing views on land ownership, which was communal and tied to sustainable use, clashed with European notions of individual property rights and exploitation for wealth. The conflicting worldviews and the European focus on economic gain, religious conversion, and territorial expansion led to the marginalization of indigenous customs, economies, and political structures.
The Europeans' approach to land as private property to be cultivated and owned, in contrast to the indigenous perspective of shared resources, drastically altered the way of life for Native peoples. Furthermore, European colonialism imposed European economic systems, displaced traditional industries with industrially produced goods, and often utilized authoritarian, militaristic, and extractive methods to maintain control over the colonies. This control often extended to the expectation of cultural assimilation, including religious conversion, further diminishing the influence and autonomy of indigenous populations.