The scene from 'Donut Day at the Office' exemplifies Legal Positivism, where established rules in an employee handbook dictate behavior similarly to how laws regulate society, highlighting the authority of enacted rules over individual judgments.
From the dialog about "Donut Day at the Office", we can discern that the legal school of thought illustrated is Legal Positivism. Karen's introduction of donuts and the ensuing discussions reveal an established system of rules laid out in an employee handbook, much like formal laws in a society. This focus on established rules and regulations as the ultimate authority in determining appropriate behavior is a hallmark of Legal Positivism. This school believes that the validity of law is not connected with morality but rather the fact that it has been enacted by a legitimate governmental authority and is accepted by society. Notably, the Lochner v. New York case is antithetical to Legal Positivism as it suggests that there are limitations on legislative power, implying an alignment with natural law or constitutional interpretation rather than pure positivism.