63.3k views
4 votes
Under the provisions of the real estate settlement procedures act, which of the following is not a violation?

1) Failure to provide a good faith estimate of closing costs
2) Requiring the use of a specific title insurance company
3) Charging excessive fees for settlement services
4) Providing the borrower with a copy of the HUD-1 settlement statement

User Dom Hede
by
7.6k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Final answer:

Requiring the use of a specific title insurance company is not a violation under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA). The other options listed in the question are violations of RESPA.

Step-by-step explanation:

Under the provisions of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA), requiring the use of a specific title insurance company is not a violation. However, the other options listed in the question are violations of RESPA:

  1. Failure to provide a good faith estimate of closing costs is a violation of RESPA. Lenders are required to provide borrowers with an estimate of the closing costs involved in a real estate transaction.
  2. Charging excessive fees for settlement services is also a violation of RESPA. RESPA prohibits the charging of fees that are not reasonably related to the services provided.
  3. Providing the borrower with a copy of the HUD-1 settlement statement is a requirement under RESPA. The HUD-1 settlement statement provides a detailed breakdown of the costs and fees associated with the real estate transaction.

User Marshall Fryman
by
7.9k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories