Final answer:
Central authority and command and control approaches are not generally effective in the complex U.S. organizational structures due to the needs for flexibility, responsiveness, and innovation in today's fast-paced environment.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether central authority and command and control approaches are generally effective in the complex organizational structures of the United States is often seen as subjective. However, looking at the evidence from various perspectives, one can argue that such approaches are not typically effective due to the intricate and diverse nature of bureaucratic operations and societal needs, particularly in the federal system of governance in the U.S. Moreover, the American governmental and military structures show that while authoritarian, central command could potentially enforce long-term planning and impose sacrifices for longer-term goals, such an approach could lead to tyranny and is not primarily aimed at global peace but rather at securing a country's own interests. These hierarchical systems are not as responsive to change or efficient in the fast-paced environment of the modern information age. Put succinctly, in an age that demands flexibility, innovation, and quick response, rigid bureaucratic structures hamper the ability to adapt quickly and efficiently to new challenges.