Final answer:
When determining the highest-rated source, facts and expert opinion are paramount, with a citation style such as MLA, APA, or Chicago being used for crediting sources. The organization of the review is guided by a source's authority, accuracy, relevance, and the writer's reflection on the source's impact on their work.
Step-by-step explanation:
When evaluating sources for a research project or paper, the choice of which source to rate highest depends on the criteria one sets for quality and relevance. Personally, I have found that relying most on facts and expert opinion provides a strong foundation for academic research. This is because facts offer a verifiable and concrete basis for arguments, while expert opinions provide insights and interpretations that are respected in the field.
The type of citation commonly used for crediting material not written by oneself is the MLA, APA, or Chicago Style, depending on the field of study or preference of the instructor. Each citation style has its own format and rules, but they all serve the purpose of avoiding plagiarism by giving proper credit to the original authors.
For organizing a review, I would focus on aspects of the source such as its authority, accuracy, currency, relevance, and purpose. Factors like the turning-point moment or event in the research, as well as the reflection on the quality of the source, all play a significant role in determining the impact the source has on my work. The writing process that comes most naturally to me is the synthesis of information, while proper citation is often the most meticulous and time-consuming.