Final answer:
Without specific elevation data for Calipatara, we cannot determine the precise difference in elevation with Sydney. However, since Sydney is near the relatively low-lying Great Dividing Range, and Australia is the flattest continent, the elevation difference is unlikely to be substantial unless one location is significantly higher in the range.
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine the difference in elevation between Calipatara and Sydney, it's important to have specific elevation data for both locations. However, in this scenario, there was no elevation provided for Calipatara. From the provided reference, we can discuss Sydney, which is located near the low-lying region of the Great Dividing Range in Australia.
While Sydney itself is not at a high elevation, the Great Dividing Range is noted for being a mountain chain with peaks reaching elevations just over 7,000 feet at its highest. Since Australia is the flattest continent with low relief, most of its landforms are not very elevated compared to other continents.
The Darling-Murray River, which originates in the Great Dividing Range, is mentioned as Australia's largest river system, though this does not directly inform about Sydney's elevation.
Without specific information on Calipatara, we cannot calculate an exact difference in elevation but can infer that since both locations are on the generally low-lying continent of Australia, significant elevation differences are unlikely unless one of the locations is atop a higher peak of the Great Dividing Range or similar highland.