Final answer:
The Pullman Strike of 1894 was a pivotal event where workers protested poor wages and living conditions against company owner George Pullman, leading to a federal intervention. A newspaper that supported the workers would focus on their struggle, while one supporting Pullman would emphasize the need for order and economic stability. Without specific details on each newspaper, it's impossible to assign which paper supported which side.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Pullman Strike of 1894 was a significant moment in American labor history, marked by a standoff between workers of the Pullman Company and the owner George Pullman, with the federal government intervening on behalf of the company. Workers declared a strike due to a reduction in wages without a corresponding decrease in rent and living costs in the Pullman-owned company town, a situation that was exacerbated by the economic depression of the 1890s. As the American Railway Union, led by Eugene Debs, supported the Pullman workers by refusing to handle trains with Pullman cars, the impact rippled throughout the rail industry, leading to the federal government's deployment of troops to quell the strike.
Given the context, a newspaper that supported the plight of the workers would likely have highlighted the unfair labor practices and the workers' struggle for fair wages and living conditions, while a paper siding with Pullman would have focused on the economic implications and the need to maintain order and support for businesses. It is hard to determine exactly which numbered newspapers supported which side as the specific names or positions of 'Newspaper A,' 'B,' 'C,' or 'D' are not provided. Still, the description implies that there were differing journalistic perspectives on the issue.