Final answer:
Access could improve the expedience of judge-alone trials and lead to a more consistent application of the law by removing the jury selection process and reducing variability in verdicts through the expertise of judges.
Step-by-step explanation:
One way that Access could improve judge-alone trials is by ensuring a more speedy resolution of cases. Since a judge-alone trial does not involve jury selection, the trial can begin more quickly, saving time for the court and the accused who may have pressing commitments such as work or caring for loved ones. The elimination of the jury also speeds up the trial process itself, as time is not spent on jury deliberations, making access to justice faster and more efficient.
Another improvement could be the increase in consistency of verdicts. A judge is a legal expert with experience in interpreting law and evidence, which can lead to more predictable outcomes based on legal principles and precedents, without the potential variability introduced by lay jurors who may be influenced by their personal feelings and biases. This could enhance the fairness and impartiality of the trial process, bolstering public confidence in the legal system.Another way Access would improve judge-alone trials is by providing easy access to case information and documents. The platform can store and organize all case-related information, making it readily available to judges, lawyers, and other involved parties. This eliminates the need for physical paperwork and allows for quick and easy retrieval of necessary documents during the trial.