70.4k views
2 votes
Human speech directed at infants, also known as baby talk, tends to use a higher pitch and slower tempo than standard speech and is known to accelerate language learning. Noting similarities between this infant-directed speech and the tone with which pet-owners address their dogs, researchers hypothesized that baby talk is not adopted due to the age of a given listener, but instead tends to be used when addressing any listener that is non-verbal. Which finding, if true, would most directly support the researchers' hypothesis?

1) People tend to raise their pitch and slow their tempo when speaking to adult humans who are non-verbal.
2) People tend to speak to other verbal adults with a lower pitch and faster tempo.
3) Non-verbal adults tend to show less reactivity to baby talk than infants and children.
4) People tend to view their pet as juvenile regardless of the pet's actual age.

User Marc Ortiz
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Final answer:

The finding that would most directly support the researchers' hypothesis is that people tend to speak to other verbal adults with a lower pitch and faster tempo.

Step-by-step explanation:

The finding that would most directly support the researchers' hypothesis is option 2) People tend to speak to other verbal adults with a lower pitch and faster tempo. If baby talk is used when addressing any listener that is non-verbal, then it would be reasonable to expect that people would use a different speaking style when communicating with verbal adults. By speaking to other verbal adults with a lower pitch and faster tempo, it would indicate that the use of higher pitch and slower tempo is specifically directed towards non-verbal individuals, supporting the researchers' hypothesis.

User Srivathsa
by
8.6k points