Question

The researchers in a veterinary lab are discussing a proposed experiment. Two of the head researchers want to modify the genetic material of a type of bird that is in danger of extinction. They believe that they can make the bird better able to tolerate warmer temperatures. The other two researchers are staunchly against the project. Which statement would most likely be one reasoning point that these opposing researchers might make?

1) Using technology to modify an animal's genetic structure could teach scientists how to do the same for humans.
2) Using technology to modify an animal's genetic structure would give the modified animals advantages that others wouldn't have.
3) Using technology to modify an animal's genetic structure could go wrong and cause the animal to have serious disabilities.
4) Using technology to modify an animal's genetic structure could make the animal immune to common diseases.

Answer 1

Opposing researchers might assert that genetic modifications carry the risk of unintended and harmful consequences to the modified animal, potentially decreasing biodiversity and diminishing adaptability.

Step-by-step explanation:

The researchers in a veterinary lab who are against modifying the genetic material of a bird species that is in danger of extinction might argue that: Using technology to modify an animal's genetic structure could go wrong and cause the animal to have serious disabilities. This concern arises from the potential unintended consequences of modifying genetics, which may include creating less biodiversity within the species and making the species less adaptable in the face of unforeseen threats. Moreover, with the irreversible nature of certain genetic modifications, especially concerning germ-line interventions, there is a risk that any negative outcomes could be passed on to future generations of the species, further compromising its survival.