Final answer:
The company's requirement seems to go against the core principle of equity by unfairly favoring individuals who can afford certain luxuries. This violates social justice ideals which aim for fair and equitable access to opportunities, regardless of socioeconomic status or material possessions.
Step-by-step explanation:
The company requiring employees to wear designer clothes and drive expensive vehicles before they can be hired appears to violate the core principle of social justice, specifically the principle of equity. Equity in social justice refers to the idea of providing individuals with different circumstances the resources they need to enjoy similar outcomes. By imposing such requirements, the company is unjustly elevating people who can afford designer clothes and luxury cars and excluding those who cannot, which conflicts with a society that values equity and inclusion.
According to John Rawls's theory of social justice, a just society would be designed by rational beings from behind a 'veil of ignorance', where no one knows their position in society. Such a society would minimize discrimination and ensure fair distribution of opportunities and resources. An individual's socioeconomic status should not determine their suitability for a job, and as such, the company's practices could contribute to perpetuating systemic inequalities.
In contexts where social status might otherwise correlate with the professional opportunities available, concepts of social equity and justice aim to create an inclusive environment where all qualified individuals have a fair chance at employment, regardless of extraneous factors like personal wealth or visible markers of social class.
This idea supports the social justice value of economic inclusion and communitarianism, which opposes the values of excessive competition and individualism that prioritize personal gains over community welfare.