Final Answer:
a. Journal Entries:
Aug 3: Professional Fees Expense $79,500, Professional Fees Payable $79,500.
Aug 10: Travel Costs Expense $15,700, Cash $15,700.
Aug 14: Professional Fees Expense $81,000, Professional Fees Payable $81,000.
Aug 18: Expert Testimony Expense $49,700, Accounts Payable $49,700.
Aug 27: Professional Fees Expense $20,250, Office Overhead Applied $20,250.
Aug 31: Admin and Support Salaries Expense $42,600, Cash $42,600.
Aug 31: Office Supplies Expense $14,400, Accounts Payable $14,400.
Aug 31: Professional Salaries Expense $173,500, Cash $173,500.
Aug 31: Accounts Receivable $361,900, Professional Fees Revenue $361,900.
b. Office Overhead: No over- or underapplied ($0).
c. Gross Profit on Obsidian Case: $210,950.
Step-by-step explanation:
In August, the law firm incurred various costs related to cases. Journal entries record these transactions, ensuring accurate accounting. Office overhead is overapplied by $36,750, calculated as the difference between applied and actual overhead costs. The gross profit on the Obsidian case is $194,450, considering service revenue, professional fees, expert testimony, and adjusting for overapplied office overhead. This information aids the firm in financial analysis and decision-making.
a. The journal entries record the August transactions. Professional fees are debited for hours worked at the respective rates, travel costs are reimbursed, expert testimony expense is recognized, office overhead is applied, and various salaries and expenses are recorded. Billing to Obsidian is also recognized.
b. To calculate over- or underapplied office overhead, the applied overhead ($75 per professional hour * 270 hours) is compared to the actual overhead applied ($20,250). In this case, there is no over- or underapplied overhead, as both amounts are equal.
c. The gross profit on the Obsidian case is determined by subtracting the total professional fees and expert testimony expense from the professional fees revenue. The result is a gross profit of $210,950 for the successful defense of the Obsidian case.