Question

Emerson and Thoreau both adhere to transcendentalist ideas and address the shared topic of one's relationship with society. Yet, despite their shared experiences and information, they come to different conclusions. Compare the development of the arguments Emerson and Thoreau make about solitude. Evaluate the validity and effectiveness of their claims, and their use of reasoning. How does each use the same transcendentalist philosophies to develop their differing arguments? Which argument is more persuasive, and why? Be sure to cite evidence from both texts to justify your reasoning. You may also choose to refer back to the literary focus lesson to help support your response.

Answer 1

Emerson and Thoreau develop their arguments about solitude based on transcendentalist ideas and their relationship with society. Thoreau's argument is more persuasive because he provides concrete examples from his own experiences in Walden and his advocacy for civil disobedience.

Step-by-step explanation:

Emerson and Thoreau both develop their arguments about solitude based on transcendentalist ideas and their relationship with society. While Emerson emphasizes self-reliance, Thoreau focuses on the connection with nature. Emerson argues that solitude is necessary for self-growth and individuality, while Thoreau sees solitude as a way to escape societal pressures and find true freedom. Both authors use transcendentalist philosophies to support their arguments; however, Thoreau's argument is more persuasive because he provides concrete examples from his own experiences in Walden and his advocacy for civil disobedience.