Final answer:
Effective evidence to support the prioritization of nuclear energy includes the data on low carbon emissions from the World Nuclear Association and the safety records and technological advancements emphasized by Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy.
Step-by-step explanation:
When arguing that countries should prioritize nuclear energy, it's important to choose evidence that's effective and convincing. Here are two pivotal pieces of evidence to support the argument:
- The World Nuclear Association highlights that nuclear power is a low carbon energy source, producing only about 12 grams of CO2 per kilowatt-hour over its lifecycle, which is comparable to wind power and much less than fossil fuels. This evidence, rooted in empirical data, supports the argument that nuclear energy can significantly contribute to reducing carbon emissions and combating climate change.
- Another piece of evidence comes from Environmentalists for Nuclear Energy, who argue that nuclear power is safe and reliable. They contend that modern nuclear reactors are designed with multiple safety systems and have an excellent safety record. This contributes to the argument by addressing the common concerns about the inherent risks of nuclear energy and emphasizing technological advancements in safety.
Both pieces of evidence work together to support the thesis that nuclear energy is a sustainable and secure energy source that could help in the global transition away from fossil fuels. By presenting these facts, you can effectively address both environmental and safety concerns raised by opponents such as Greenpeace and NIRS, thereby strengthening the argument for nuclear energy.