Final answer:
The closing of Boston Harbor by the British was not a precursor to the Stamp and Sugar Acts, but it was a response to the Boston Tea Party, seen as outrageous and intolerable by the American colonists, and a part of the Coercive Acts passed by Parliament.
Step-by-step explanation:
The closing of Boston Harbor by the British was all of the following except:
- A precursor to the Stamp and Sugar Acts
- A response to the Boston Tea Party
- Seen as outrageous and intolerable by the American colonists
- A part of the Coercive Acts passed by Parliament
The closing of Boston Harbor was not a precursor to the Stamp and Sugar Acts, as those acts were passed before the Boston Harbor closure.
However, it was a response to the Boston Tea Party and was seen as outrageous and intolerable by the American colonists. Additionally, it was a part of the Coercive Acts passed by Parliament as a punishment for Massachusetts.