Final answer:
Proponents of the Popular Vote argue that it would be a fairer system that better reflects the will of the people. It would give every voter a meaningful say in the election, encourage candidates to campaign in all states, and eliminate the possibility of a president winning the popular vote but losing the election.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether it is a good idea for New Mexico and other states to adopt the Popular Vote over the Electoral College is a matter of opinion. However, proponents of the Popular Vote argue that it would be a fairer system that better reflects the will of the people. By counting all votes equally and eliminating the winner-takes-all approach, the Popular Vote would give every voter a meaningful say in the election. Supporters also argue that the Popular Vote would encourage candidates to campaign in all states, not just in battleground states. Currently, under the Electoral College, candidates tend to focus on a few key states, leading to a significant number of states being ignored in the general election. Lastly, advocates for the Popular Vote assert that it would eliminate the possibility of a president winning the popular vote but losing the election, as has happened in the past. This would help ensure that the candidate who receives the most votes nationwide becomes president.