Final answer:
Determining if Frank provides sufficient evidence to persuade most people requires critical evaluation of the evidence's credibility, relevance, and completeness, as well as scrutiny of testimonies and consensus among experts. Additional factors to consider include logical consistency, possible biases, and alternative explanations.
Step-by-step explanation:
Assessing whether Frank presents enough evidence to convince most people involves several critical thinking steps. Firstly, consider if the first reading of the evidence is persuasive enough, and whether the logic presented is credible. It also entails reviewing if any relevant points that would impact the conclusion have been omitted by the writer. When evaluating the claim, you should reflect on the given answers and how they affect your willingness to accept the author's conclusions.
The process of deciding on the soundness of a claim requires careful consideration of the evidence and sources involved. This includes questioning the expertise and potential biases of the person supplying the testimony, and if this testimony reflects the consensus among experts. Furthermore, interpretations of documents, such as whether Daisy Miller is innocent or if Morris Rossabi is a reliable source, influence the perception of evidence credibility.
If a friend claims to have resolved a philosophical question rationally, adhering to the laws of thought without contradiction, and using principles like Ockham's Razor and the principle of sufficient reason, you might still question the correctness of the answer. You may need additional persuasion or evidence to be fully convinced. Similarly, an experience reported by someone, such as Gloria's near-death experience, may not be convincing enough to separate the mind and body without further justifying evidence or addressing the claims of researchers attributing such experiences to neurological activity.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the strength of Frank's evidence and the consequent level of persuasion can vary based on the individual's judgment and the standards of proof deemed necessary. Each argument and piece of evidence has strong and weak points, and no single argument is likely powerful enough to convince everyone on its own.