Final answer:
Military action can sometimes serve as a deterrence or prevent further conflict, but it often causes harm and should be a last resort after all diplomatic avenues have been explored.
Step-by-step explanation:
Whether military action is ever a good choice in resolving conflicts is a complex and controversial issue. On the one hand, history has shown that military intervention can at times halt aggressions and serve as a deterrent to future conflicts, as seen during Operation Desert Storm. On the other hand, military action often leads to significant loss of life and destabilization, as was the case with the Somali conflict in 1993. While some may argue that the use of military force is necessary when diplomatic efforts have failed, it should be weighed heavily against its potential to cause long-term harm and should ideally be aligned with broader international consensus. In some cases, such as preventing genocide or stopping aggressive expansion of hostile powers, military action might be justified, but it should always be considered a last resort after exhausting all diplomatic options