131k views
3 votes
How does the exercise of presidential power in the twenty-first century compare with the views of the Framers of the Constitution?

a) The exercise of presidential power aligns with the Framers' views.
b) The exercise of presidential power significantly deviates from the Framers' views.
c) The exercise of presidential power is irrelevant to the Framers' views.
d) The exercise of presidential power is similar to the Framers' views in some aspects.

User KentZhou
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The exercise of presidential power in the twenty-first century significantly deviates from the views of the Framers of the Constitution.

Step-by-step explanation:

The exercise of presidential power in the twenty-first century significantly deviates from the views of the Framers of the Constitution. The Framers designed the presidency to be within a system of checks and balances, with limitations on unilateral actions. However, in recent years, presidents have increasingly been using executive orders and bypassing Congress to push their agenda, which goes against the intent of the Framers.

For example, President Obama's strategy on the Iran nuclear deal was controversial because it bypassed Congress, and President Trump's use of executive orders to implement policies has faced legal challenges. These actions demonstrate a departure from the Framers' emphasis on cooperation and consultation in policymaking.

While some aspects of presidential power today may align with the Framers' views, such as the duty to protect the country and political system, the overall exercise of presidential power in the twenty-first century differs significantly from what the Framers intended.

User Kiki Jewell
by
8.1k points