Final answer:
The conflict between Henry Cabot Lodge and Woodrow Wilson over the League of Nations was a significant event in U.S. history. Lodge believed that the League would improperly control the United States, while Wilson argued for the united force of the world's nations. I agree with Wilson that the united force of the world's nations is the best hope for peace.
Step-by-step explanation:
The conflict between Henry Cabot Lodge and Woodrow Wilson over the League of Nations was a significant event in U.S. history. Lodge, a conservative senator, believed that the League would improperly control the United States, while Wilson, the president, argued that the united force of the world's nations was the best hope for peace. The debate centered around the substance of the treaty as well as the role of the two men's personalities.
I personally agree with Wilson that the united force of the world's nations is the best hope for peace. In a world connected by trade, politics, and diplomacy, it is crucial for nations to come together to address global challenges and conflicts. The League of Nations, although not perfect, serves as an important mechanism for maintaining peace, promoting international cooperation, and resolving disputes.