Final answer:
The arguments in favor of and against the removal of the Cherokee from their land were based on economic prosperity and the rights of the Cherokee to their ancestral lands.
Step-by-step explanation:
There were arguments made both in favor and against the removal of the Cherokee from their land. Those in favor of removal argued that it would lead to economic prosperity for white settlers as they could utilize the rich agricultural lands. They believed that the Cherokee were not capable of becoming full citizens and saw them as obstacles to expansion and development. On the other hand, those against removal argued that the Cherokee had adopted many aspects of white culture and had successfully adapted to a farming lifestyle. They believed that the Cherokee had a right to their ancestral lands and that forcibly removing them would be unjust.