Answer:
Rereading and reflecting on an analytical report is essential for the development of ideas and the improvement of writing. Peer review comments contribute to refining the work by highlighting the need for topic sentences and proper citation. The reflective practice enhances the understanding and effectiveness of the report.
Step-by-step explanation:
Reflecting on my analytical report not only requires a close examination of my writing but also an understanding of the ideas I have conveyed. When I reread the work, focusing intently on the central question I posed, it becomes evident that my exploration of this topic has evolved. Throughout this process, I took meticulous notes, enriching the context of my exploration and allowing for a dynamic interaction with my thoughts. Writing an exploratory journal entry has given me the freedom to play with ideas, delve deeper into the subject matter, and emerge with a more nuanced understanding.
Engaging in a peer review can reveal areas that need further development. For instance, my reviewers noted that certain paragraphs lacked a topic sentence and could be merged for clarity and cohesion. This feedback was invaluable, as it directed me toward refining my writing by adding a topic sentence and expanding on my examples, making sure to properly cite quotations. The reflective task led me to ask myself questions about the effectiveness of my argument, the clarity of my thought process, and the impact of the work on the intended audience and my own learning.