224k views
2 votes
To fulfill the task of reading two Asian poems and quoting them inside the box, after which they will present their common topics and relate their own feelings to the feelings expressed in the poems heard, which of the following options best fits the task?

a) The options provided do not directly address the task.
b) Option b) is the most relevant to the task.
c) Option a) is the most relevant to the task.
d) Option c) is the most relevant to the task.

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The assignment involves comparing and contrasting two Asian poems and relating personal feelings to the themes expressed. Focus on literary elements is crucial, such as tone, diction, imagery, and themes. Without the actual options provided, a definitive answer to the multiple-choice part of the question cannot be given.

Step-by-step explanation:

The task presented requires a compare and contrast analysis of two Asian poems, focusing on identifying common themes and relating the evaluator's own feelings to those expressed in the poems. To properly quote the poems and analyze them, it is crucial to note literary elements such as tone, diction, imagery, and theme(s). Moreover, understanding of the subject is deepened by examining different treatments of similar topics, as shown in the example of Anne Brontë's ‘Home,’ and Grace Nichols's ‘Wherever I Hang.’ This comparison helps to recognize the various literary strategies and the effectiveness of the poetic expression in addressing the subject of exile. Contextualizing a theme within a period, as in comparing 16th-century poets and their perspective on love, can illustrate how themes are explored differently.

The response to the initial question depends on the options provided, which are not included in the description; therefore, one cannot conclusively determine which option (a, b, c) best suits the task without further context. However, this exercise of reading and reviewing poems aligns with the objectives detailed in Section 1.5: summarizing, paraphrasing, explaining, analyzing, and evaluating a reading selection in light of the writer's intent and conventional expectations.

User Axalo
by
7.9k points