166k views
0 votes
When Alfred Wegener first proposed his theory of continental drift, most Earth scientists did not immediately accept it. Many expressed skepticism because the theory did not explain what force was strong enough to move continents. Later, scientists investigating continental drift found evidence that explained how continents are able to move. Plate tectonics, which grew from the theory of continental drift, now explains how continents move over time. How was the initial skepticism of earth scientists useful to the scientific process?

a) It delayed the progress of science.
b) It prevented the theory from gaining acceptance.
c) It led to the development of the plate tectonics theory.
d) It confirmed Wegener's theory

User Mustafa J
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Final answer:

The initial skepticism of earth scientists regarding Alfred Wegener's theory of continental drift was essential as it led to the development of the plate tectonics theory.

Step-by-step explanation:

When Alfred Wegener first proposed his theory of continental drift, the initial skepticism of earth scientists played a crucial role in advancing scientific knowledge. Rather than confirming Wegener's theory or preventing its acceptance, the skepticism led to the development of the plate tectonics theory. This demonstrates how skepticism in science is useful; it acts as a catalyst for further investigation and evidence gathering, which ultimately strengthens the scientific process and leads to a more robust understanding of natural phenomena.

User Daniel Schneller
by
7.2k points