Question

Sykes and Matza argue that people will use techniques of neutralization to justify their illegal behavior in ways that allow them to avoid guilt. Discuss which technique you think is most commonly used to justify behavior. Provide examples to support your claim.

A) Denial of Responsibility
B) Denial of Injury
C) Condemnation of the Condemners
D) Appeal to Higher Loyalties

Answer 1

The most commonly used techniques of neutralization to justify behavior include Denial of Responsibility, Appeal to Higher Loyalties, and Condemnation of the Condemners. The correct answer is option D

Step-by-step explanation:

The technique of neutralization that is most commonly used to justify behavior is Denial of Responsibility. This technique involves not taking responsibility for one's actions and instead blaming others or external factors. For example, an employee who stole money from their workplace might justify their actions by blaming their low wages or personal problems.

Another common technique used to justify behavior is Appeal to Higher Loyalties. This involves claiming that the actions were done for a greater purpose or loyalty. For instance, the employee may justify stealing money by saying they needed it to help a sick family member.

Lastly, the Condemnation of the Condemners technique is also commonly used. This technique involves shifting the blame onto the accuser and questioning their judgment or authority. The employee may argue that the boss doesn't understand their circumstances and has no right to judge them. The correct answer is option D