156k views
3 votes
Compare the social class make-up of the Roman Senate and the Athenian Assembly (Doc E). What does this comparison tell you about the political power of the average citizen in each society?

a) The Roman Senate was composed of aristocrats, while the Athenian Assembly included a broader range of citizens. This suggests that the average citizen in Athens had more political power than in Rome.

b) The Roman Senate and the Athenian Assembly both consisted mainly of aristocrats, indicating that the average citizen had limited political power in both societies.

c) The Roman Senate had a more diverse social class composition compared to the Athenian Assembly. This implies that the average citizen in Rome had greater political influence.

d) The Roman Senate had no social class restrictions, while the Athenian Assembly was exclusive to the elite. This highlights the higher political power of the average citizen in Rome.

User Yko
by
7.4k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The social class make-up of the Roman Senate and Athenian Assembly differed, with the Athenian Assembly including a broader range of citizens. This suggests that the average citizen in Athens had more political power than in Rome.

Step-by-step explanation:

Both the Roman Senate and the Athenian Assembly had distinct social class make-ups. The Roman Senate was composed of aristocrats or patricians, who held the majority of political power in Rome. On the other hand, the Athenian Assembly included a broader range of citizens, although it still had some class restrictions. This suggests that the average citizen in Athens had more political power than in Rome, as they had a greater opportunity to participate in the political process.

User Pulkit Sharma
by
7.4k points