Question

The high school wants to make student participation in the performing arts a requirement. These programs already have high rates of participation, and the school would have to expand both the facilities and staff to meet this requirement, which will place more stress on an already strained budget. What does the writer likely think about this proposed requirement?

A. It will boost the success of the current programs.
B. It is not needed and not worth the increased costs.
C. It is better if students do not participate in the arts.
D. It will lead to better academic performance for students.

Answer 1

The writer likely believes that making student participation in performing arts mandatory is not needed and not worthwhile due to budgetary concerns, despite potential benefits in academic performance.

Step-by-step explanation:

The writer's view on the proposed requirement for mandatory student participation in the performing arts seems to lean towards the idea that while arts education can potentially improve academic performance, the financial strain on the school's budget might not justify the expansion of facilities and staff required to make participation a requirement. This suggests that the writer likely thinks the proposal is not needed and not worth the increased costs (Option B), especially considering the current high rates of voluntary participation and the already existing budget constraints. Moreover, the referenced texts indicate that simply increasing financial resources has not led to measurable gains in student performance, suggesting that structural issues might be at the core of educational challenges rather than just funding.