Final answer:
A) Supporting the cause of World War I is a complex stance considering the war's intricate causes and implications. The U.S. initially aimed for neutrality but shifted towards intervention due to trade relationships, German hostilities, and democratic ideals.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question of whether one A) supports the cause of World War I (WWI) isn't about advocating for war itself but rather understanding the complex causes and global impacts of the conflict.
The causes of WWI include militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism. Issues such as entangling alliances and the struggle for global dominance have continuing repercussions in modern foreign policy.
For instance, the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand led to a cascade of events fueled by these causes, eventually dragging the United States and other nations into a costly and devastating war.
At the onset of WWI, the United States was primarily focused on domestic issues and aimed to remain neutral.
However, factors such as trade relations that favored the Allies, tensions with Germany over unrestricted submarine warfare, and the ideals of democracy eventually led President Woodrow Wilson to shift from a stance of neutrality to one of intervention.
Given the complexity of the causes and the scale of destruction, it is difficult to provide a straightforward answer to whether one supports the cause of WWI.
Factors like modern weaponry, the use of colonial troops, and the domestic implications such as restrictions on civil liberties also come into consideration when evaluating the war's legacy.