39.7k views
3 votes
Is this a proportional relationship? Explain your reasoning.

a) Yes, it is a proportional relationship because the ratio of distance to time is constant.
b) No, it is not a proportional relationship because the distance and time values do not form a straight line.
c) Yes, it is a proportional relationship because the distance and time values are equal.
d) No, it is not a proportional relationship because the equation is not linear.

User JeffO
by
8.7k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Final answer:

The relationship is proportional because the given equation is linear with a y-intercept of 0, indicating a constant ratio between distance and time which results in a straight line when graphed.

Step-by-step explanation:

To determine whether there is a proportional relationship between two quantities, we should check if the ratio between them is constant. In this case, the given equation is y = (2.0 km/min) t, which can be seen as y = mt + b where m is the slope (rate of change) and b is the y-intercept. When b = 0, as in this equation, it means the line goes through the origin (0,0) on a graph. This indicates a directly proportional relationship because as time (t) increases, the distance (y) increases at a constant rate.

For the relationship to be proportional, there should be a straight line when plotted on a graph. As per the information given, the equation y = (2.0 km/min) t + 0 implies a linear graph with a slope of 2.0 km/min and a y-intercept of 0. This satisfies the condition for a proportional relationship where the equation is of the form y = kx, and there is no constant term added (b = 0). Therefore, statement a) 'Yes, it is a proportional relationship because the ratio of distance to time is constant' is the correct answer.

User Rafael Baptista
by
8.2k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories