Final answer:
When new evidence does not support an accepted scientific theory, the usual process is to modify the theory rather than discard it. Scientific theories can change with new evidence, while scientific laws, which describe patterns in data often with mathematical equations, remain distinct.
Step-by-step explanation:
Scientific Theories and Evidence
When scientific evidence is established that does not support an accepted theory, the next step is typically not to discard the theory outright but to reconsider and possibly modify the theory in light of the new evidence. Scientific theories are robust and broad explanations that have been repeatedly tested and supported by a significant body of evidence. However, they are not immutable; they can change with new evidence.
It is important to understand that scientific theories and laws have different roles in science. A scientific law describes a repeated observation about the world and often comes in the form of a mathematical equation. In contrast, a theory is an explanation for these observations and is based on evidence. Therefore, a theory does not become a law with more evidence, nor does a law become a theory; they are distinct components within the scientific framework.
When new evidence that doesn’t fit an accepted theory emerges, scientists will rigorously test the discrepancies and update or refine the theory as needed. This process may involve numerous iterations and contributions from different scientists, and sometimes it may result in significant changes or even paradigm shifts in scientific understanding. The ongoing advancement of scientific knowledge ensures that even long-held theories remain subject to new evidence and technological breakthroughs.