149k views
1 vote
I have these questions about the vice presidential debate for whoever watched it.

1. Who is the moderator, and what are the main topics in this debate?
2. What seems to be the main point(s), claims, or arguments each candidate is trying to make? Which candidate was most effective at conveying their point(s)?
3. What image of themselves and their opponent did each candidate try and create? How respectful were they to each other?
4. Did the candidates talk specifically about how to solve problems and compare their own proposals with their opponents? Or did they avoid specifics and/or evade questions to steer them in a way they wanted? Give examples.
5. What were the primary disagreements between the candidates? On what did the candidates agree?
6. Did either candidate make any obvious mistakes or errors? (Explain)
7. Did you learn anything new about either of the candidates? (What?)
8. What were each candidate’s strengths and weaknesses? Did one candidate clearly do better than the other? In your opinion, who "won" the debate and why?
9. What were the particularly memorable moments (gaffes, "zingers", jokes, etc.)?
10. Did the audience seem to favor one candidate or another? What points made by each candidate received the best audience response?
11. What television or radio network did you watch or listen to? What comments can you make about the way they covered the debate (camera shots and angles, commentary and analysis (pre-and post-), narration, etc.)? Which candidate did they think won the debate?

1 Answer

6 votes

Final answer:

The 1960 televised presidential debate between Kennedy and Nixon illustrates the impact of media image on public perception. Kennedy's strong presentation contrasted with Nixon's poor image convinced viewers of his superiority, while radio listeners favored Nixon's detailed responses. The event underscored the importance of media preparation for candidates.

Step-by-step explanation:

The 1960 televised presidential debate between Senator John F. Kennedy, the Democratic nominee, and Vice President Richard Nixon, the Republican nominee, provides a clear instance of how media image and presentation can influence public perception in political debates.

Kennedy's attention to appearance and demeanor, such as tan complexion, calm poise, and direct engagement with the camera, contrasted with Nixon's gaunt appearance and lack of makeup, giving Kennedy an edge with television viewers despite Nixon's more detailed responses resonating with radio listeners. This event highlights the importance of preparation and presentation in addition to substance when it comes to televised debates.

Debates remain a critical component of elections, allowing voters to evaluate candidates on their policies, reactions under stress, and their abilities to convey a clear message to the public. Strategies for debating effectively, such as those recommended by Paul Begala, emphasize relaxation, humor, preparation, and a strong reminder that candidates are always on camera, where even minor slips can be seized upon by the media.

Given the reciprocal relationship between politicians and the media, with the media acting as both gatekeeper and watchdog, candidates must deftly navigate these interactions to maintain a positive public image.

User Dgo
by
8.5k points