Question

Not every school can be as enlightened as LACS, but every school should try. Teachers must either incorporate intrinsic motivation into their classrooms or be left with a system of rewards and punishments that stifles creativity and students’ desire to learn. Teachers’ behaviors may even affect student achievement. A 2014 study that clustered intermediate-level students into three groups—high intrinsic and high extrinsic motivation, high intrinsic and low extrinsic motivation, and low intrinsic and high extrinsic motivation—found that the students who were primarily intrinsically motivated outperformed their fellow students and showed the greatest increase in achievement over the course of a school year.

The argument that teachers must incorporate intrinsic motivation or be left with a rewards and punishment system that stifles students’ desire to learn is a logical fallacy based on—
A.an incorrect premise.
B.a hasty generalization
C.a faulty piece of evidence.
D.an either-or fallacy.

Answer 1

The argument that teachers must incorporate intrinsic motivation or be left with a rewards and punishment system is an example of an either-or fallacy.

Step-by-step explanation:

The argument that teachers must incorporate intrinsic motivation or be left with a rewards and punishment system that stifles students’ desire to learn is an example of a type of logic fallacy called either-or fallacy. This fallacy presents only two extreme options and ignores the possibility of a middle ground or alternative solutions. In reality, teachers can use a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation strategies to create a positive learning environment and promote student engagement.