Question

During the nullification crisis Jackson argued that, "States could only be a nation if

all states obeyed it's laws". How was this contradictory to his response to the
Supreme Court decision on Indian removal policies?

Answer 1

Andrew Jackson supported strict federal authority during the nullification crisis, insisting all states must obey federal laws, but contrarily, he undermined this principle by refusing to enforce a Supreme Court decision on Indian removal policies.

Step-by-step explanation:

During the nullification crisis, President Andrew Jackson argued that states must obey federal laws for the nation to be unified. This position is contradictory to his response concerning Indian removal policies, as Jackson refused to enforce the Supreme Court decision that was in favor of the Cherokee tribe's land rights.

While he was a proponent of states' rights, Jackson's actions exhibited his prioritization of federal authority when he considered the Union at risk. However, for the Indian Removal Act, he undermined the authority of the federal judiciary by ignoring the Supreme Court’s ruling, creating a contrast with his stance during the nullification crisis.