Question

Which option provides an accurate and objective summary of the article?

Democrats in Congress strongly support a resolution called the Green New Deal. This plan calls for major actions to combat climate change. Central to this effort is eliminating the use of fossil fuels and replacing them with renewable alternatives. Republicans oppose this plan, arguing that it is an example of socialism, is too expensive and it will be bad for businesses. Despite a recent defeat in the Senate, many Democrats are working hard to fight climate change.
Republicans and Democrats yet again do not agree on an important issue. Global climate change happens when greenhouse gases become trapped and increase the temperature on Earth. This is bad for everyone, but politicians can't agree on what to do. Democrats have a plan called the Green New Deal that would change the way the United States makes energy, but they are not sure how to pay for it. Republicans hate this plan but haven't proposed an alternative. Most scientists agree that climate change is a problem and politicians aren't helping.

Answer 1

The article examines the controversy surrounding climate change, predominantly in the United States, where scientific consensus confronts political and corporate denialism. Evidence supports human-caused global warming, yet economic and ideological resistance hinders progress, despite growing public concern and the need for governmental action.

Step-by-step explanation:

The debate regarding climate change and its consequences is a stark example of political division in the United States. The majority of the scientific community agrees that climate change is a pressing issue, yet skepticism and denial persist, predominantly among conservative factions influenced by vested interests in the fossil fuel industry. From the failure to ratify the Kyoto Protocol to the politicizing of environmental concerns, the resulting inaction has significant global ramifications.

Scientific evidence overwhelmingly supports that human activities contribute to global warming, as indicated by extensive peer-reviewed research. However, political and economic ideologies, corporate interests, and misinformation have created a controversy where there should be consensus.

This has led to a lack of widespread government support for measures to reduce greenhouse gases and counter climate change, even though public opinion, particularly among younger demographics, has shifted towards recognizing its urgency, as shown by the rise in support for the Paris Agreement and clean energy investments.

Companies fearing economic impact from environmental regulations and countries grappling with developmental aspirations further complicate the issue. Nevertheless, the United States is urged to take decisive action to reduce emissions, embrace clean energy, and support international accords to combat climate change effectively.